Follow their informed consciences and to “talk to the Lord and go forward.”
The head of ecumenical affairs for the German episcopal conference has urged his fellow bishops not to equivocate in their commitment to allow Protestant spouses in mixed marriages to receive the Eucharist at Catholic Masses.
“Enough is enough! The time has come to no longer put off a well-justified decision – even if some people still insist on contradicting it,” said Bishop Gerhard Feige of Magdeburg.
“Missing a chance like this would be both shameful and macabre!” he told the German weekly Die Zeit just days before he and several other German bishops were to head to Rome for a May 3 meeting with Vatican officials over the “Eucharistic hospitality” issue.
At their episcopal conference meeting last February more than two-thirds of Germany’s bishops approved a draft handout that would, in individual cases, allow Protestant spouses in mixed marriages to receive the Catholic Eucharist.
Bishop Feige played a lead role in compiling the handout. But there was public controversy a month later when seven of the bishops petitioned Vatican officials to clarify whether episcopal conferences actually had the authority to make such decisions.
In response, Archbishop Luis Ladaria SJ, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), and Cardinal Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, invited a small delegation of the German bishops to Rome to discuss the issue. It is to take place on May 3 and Bishop Feige will be part of that group.
In his interview with Die Zeit the bishop said the majority decision to approve the Eucharistic hospitality handout was in line with the teaching found in a number of official church documents.
These include the Second Vatican Council’s Decree on Ecumenism (Unitatis redintegratio), John Paul II’s 1995 encyclical Ut unum sint and, more particularly, the Polish saint’s 2003 encyclical Ecclesia de eucharistia.
This last document speaks of “the administration of the Eucharist under special circumstances, to individual persons belonging to churches or Ecclesial Communities not in full communion with the Catholic Church. In this case, in fact, the intention is to meet a grave spiritual need (gravis necessitas) for the salvation of an individual believer…” (No. 45).
Bishop Feige recalled that already 15 years ago the late Cardinal Joachim Meisner of Cologne said that the Vatican would “shortly” be defining how “gravis necessitas” was to be understood.
“Unfortunately, however, Rome did not come forth with a definition – and has indeed not done so up to now – and thus all efforts to solve the question of communion for mixed-marriage couples at the time were once again shelved,” he said.
But Feige said Pope Francis has since offered encouraging signs, not only in his post-synodal exhortation Amoris laetitia, but also by continually urging Christians to follow their informed consciences and to “talk to the Lord and go forward.”
“The question of communion for mixed-marriage couples also came up as a burning question at the ecumenical services at Lund and Hildesheim in the Reformation Year,” the bishop said.
He said all this had persuaded the ecumenical commission of the episcopal conference to work on the Eucharistic hospitality handout, which it then presented to all the bishops during their 2017 spring meeting. The text was widely discussed and the ecumenical commission was advised to include more theologians and work on the text for a further year.
“At the plenary in February this year, the text was again debated at length and with great commitment,” he said.
“But one got the impression that the handout’s critics were not really seeking a responsible pastoral solution for mixed marriage couples in individual cases but felt they had to fend off every slightest alteration in favor of the handout in case they would no longer be considered truly Catholic,” he said.
“Some (bishops) still seem to be clinging to a pre-conciliar church image and have not yet fully internalized the Catholic principles of ecumenism,” Feige added.
He said it was fortunate that more than three-quarters of the bishops present at the 2018 plenary voted in favor of the handout.
Considering that the issue had been under discussion in Germany for over 20 years now, no one could say that the handout had not been properly prepared or that the bishops’ vote in favor was a “lightening operation” that had taken critics by surprise, he said.
Bishop Feige ended the interview by repeating his appeal not to miss this chance to help those couples in mixed marriages who want to deepen their faith.
Those joining him in the German delegation going to Rome are Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich (bishops’ conference president), Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki of Cologne, (one of the seven who wrote to Rome asking for clarification).
Other include Bishop Felix Genn of Münster (a savvy mediator and member of the CDF who supports the handout), Bishop Karl-Heinz Wiesemann of Speyer (responsible for doctrinal affairs in the conference), Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg (signatory of the letter for clarification), and Father Hans Langendorfer SJ, (conference general secretary).
Two priests will join Archbishop Ladaria and Cardinal Koch as part of the Vatican delegation. They are Father Markus Graulich SDB, a German canon lawyer who is under-secretary of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, and Father Hermann Geissler FSO, an Austrian theologian who is an official at the CDF.
In the US…
CHICAGO — As a group of priests gathered to mark the 50th anniversary of their organization, there was some reminiscing, but most of the discussion was about the present and the future, including the need to fight racism, to work more closely with laity and even to re-imagine priesthood altogether.
“Fifty years after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., we still find ourselves confronting many of the barriers to equality and justice for which he gave such a powerful witness,” Archbishop Wilton Gregory of Atlanta told those gathered for the National Federation of Priests’ Councils (NFPC) convocation April 23-26 in Chicago.
Gregory noted that the NFPC was founded in 1968 to bring together representatives of diocesan presbyteral councils for fraternal sharing and dialogue, and that the National Black Catholic Clergy Caucus was formed that same year for a similar purpose. Since that time, “the names and the voices of yesterday’s racists have changed, but not their message,” he said.
“While we can and should look back on our predecessors with profound respect, admiration and perhaps even with a touch of envy, we must also rededicate ourselves to the same responsibilities of pastoring our people with a full portion of the courage, wisdom and determination that energized those pioneer founders of those twin priestly associations,” he said.
To address racism as well as economic injustice, violence, discrimination based on race, gender or sexual orientation, and the nativism that has “changed its attire but not its vitriol,” today’s priests need to be better formed in the church’s social justice teachings and tradition, Gregory said.
“We must help to prepare the hearts of those who will assume leadership in the next half century,” he said. “Seminary formation today must include training our candidates to see the world and its troubles as an exciting and compelling field for gathering in a harvest of justice.”
More Catholics, fewer priests
Yet, while the societal challenges have remained over the 50-year history of the NFPC, much has changed for priests in the United States.
To start with, it’s a smaller group: about 22,000 fewer religious and diocesan priests since 1967, even as the number of Catholics has increased by 24 million, according to Franciscan Sr. Katarina Schuth of the St. Paul Seminary School of Theology at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Today, more than a third of priests serve multiple parishes, Schuth said.
In many seminaries, younger, less experienced seminarians are separated from the more experienced, older lay students, leading to problems working together in parishes, she said.
Working collaboratively with laity and encouraging lay leadership was a theme at the NFPC convention, yet such collaboration is stymied by clericalism, speakers said.
Gregory called clericalism, a “particular hazard for those who are bishops in today’s church,” he said.
A “healthy presbyterate” should take pride in unity and its successes, he said. “Yet we can never do so at the expense of our friendship with and our respect for all other members of the church. Clergy and laity are meant to work together for the building up of the body of Christ.”
Concerns about clericalism were echoed by Jesuit Fr. Allan Figueroa Deck of Loyola Marymount University, who called for a shift from the “defensive and self-referential posture that characterized ‘Fortress Church’ for centuries” to a new posture of encounter that includes a priesthood of missionary and pastoral discipleship.
“The shift has been going on for more than half a century now, and many would say that it is reaching a moment of truth, a turning point, with the bold and energetic reform in attitudes and developments in teaching championed by our first Latin American and Jesuit pope,” he said.
But too often the church has ignored Vatican II’s call for dialogue and listening and has instead focused on judgement and legalism, Deck said.
“Some of us all too often allowed ourselves to come across as customs and border agents, ecclesiastical functionaries and sacramental dispensers at the cost of losing contact with the flesh and blood of God’s holy people whom we were called to shepherd, to love and serve,” he said.
Priests with a sense of “entitlement” or “narcissism” are a “formula for disaster” for diocesan personnel boards, he said.
He also lamented the “toxic attitude” of priesthood as a “niche to be occupied,” which results in defending turf rather than sharing ministry with all the baptized.
“As long as we priests focus more on limiting our job description, circumscribing our labors, or take on an ‘I-don’t-wash-windows’ mentality, the more we become obstacles to doing what really needs to be done,” he said. “We must roll up our sleeves, do what needs to be done or actively find and enable coworkers, sometimes deacons or religious but usually laity, to do it.”
Citing Pope Francis and several Vatican II documents, Deck said mission and evangelization must be the starting point for reconfiguring the priesthood. “We must put the demands of mission first rather than make mission the application of a changeless organizational scheme cast in granite,” he said.
That will require an expansive, more robust vision of priesthood, he said, noting that religious order priests have regularly ministered outside parish or diocesan structures in schools, hospitals and missions.
Instead, diocesan priests have become increasingly identified with the parish, “a fundamental instrument of evangelization but a rather static one that simply cannot respond to all of today’s pastoral challenges,” he said. “The times require a more flexible and wider range of ministries, a differentiated outreach that parishes often cannot deliver.”
Such “epochal” change will be painful, but the church needs to bring the tradition forward “with fidelity, creativity and apostolic boldness, rather than retreating into little niches, comfort zones or nostalgia,” he said.
Instead of a “circling the wagons” approach or a resignation to an “elite remnant” of conformity, priests will need to build bridges across diversity through dialogue and mutuality, he said. The model should be shepherds and servant leaders in an organization that is more horizontal than vertical.
Priests need look no further than Francis for inspiration, said Basilan Fr. Thomas Rosica, who was honored with the NFPC’s Touchstone Award. He is the founding CEO of Salt & Light Television in Toronto.
“I firmly believe that we are living a moment of kairos in the contemporary church, the appointed time and hour, when the Gospel story is unfolding before us in Technicolor 4K and Dolby sound in the life of Pope Francis,” he said.
As this pope models, there is no place in the church for “haughty clericalism,” abuse of one’s position or climbing the “ecclesiastical career ladder,” Rosica said.
Instead, he said, “Pope Francis is teaching us that our authority derives not from worldly power and prestige but from simplicity of life, personal integrity and humility in imitation of Christ.”
[Heidi Schlumpf is NCR national correspondent. Her email address is email@example.com. Follow her on Twitter @HeidiSchlumpf.]